— From direct financial support to energy mechanisms: the role of CEE in corporate electrification

In France, the electrification of corporate fleets has long moved beyond the question of whether it should be done.

What decision-makers are really facing are much more concrete concerns:
Can the numbers add up?
Can cash flow absorb the transition?
Is fleet renewal sustainable over time?

It is precisely at this level that a shift over the past year has been underestimated by many companies. As direct government subsidies for corporate vehicle purchases have been significantly reduced, the intuitive conclusion has been that policy support for corporate electrification is weakening. Yet, when one follows the institutional logic more closely, a different picture emerges: support has not disappeared — it has been redirected into a more long-term, more structured mechanism.

That mechanism is the CEE system (Certificats d’Économies d’Énergie, Energy Savings Certificates).

What is CEE? It does not answer “whether to buy vehicles,” but “how to meet energy-saving obligations”

CEE is not a policy tool specifically designed for the transport sector. Its origins lie in France’s broader energy policy.

Under this system, the state does not directly subsidize energy-saving actions. Instead, it imposes mandatory energy-saving targets on energy suppliers. If suppliers cannot meet these targets through their own activities, they must finance third-party energy-saving actions in order to “acquire” the corresponding savings. These standardized and quantified savings, measured in kWh cumac, are converted into tradable and settleable energy-saving certificates.

CEE is therefore not a fiscal expenditure, but a compliance cost internalized within the energy system.
Whoever can deliver recognized energy savings can receive an economic counterpart in return.

This point is essential, because it directly clarifies a common misunderstanding:
CEE is not a subsidy paid by the state to companies; it is a payment made by the energy system to fulfill its own regulatory obligations.

Why is vehicle electrification systematically included in the CEE framework?

Under the current framework, vehicle electrification is officially recognized as a verifiable, quantifiable, and standardizable energy-saving action.

The logic is straightforward. Compared to internal combustion vehicles, electric vehicles have a clear and demonstrable energy-efficiency advantage. Given defined assumptions regarding vehicle lifespan and mileage, their energy savings can be modeled. Once savings can be standardized, they become eligible for the CEE system.

This is why the current rules explicitly cover the following cases:

l  The purchase or long-term leasing of electric passenger cars and light commercial vehicles by companies or public entities;

l  The conversion of existing internal combustion vehicles into electric vehicles;

l  Electric light vehicles commonly used in urban services, industrial sites, or public-sector applications.

From an institutional perspective, corporate fleets are not “favored beneficiaries.” They are included because their high utilization rates, predictable usage patterns, and stable energy-saving outcomes make them naturally suited to a results-based mechanism such as CEE.

Why does CEE appear as a “price structure” rather than a “subsidy” in corporate fleets?

Unlike traditional public subsidies, CEE does not follow a “buy first, apply later, get reimbursed” logic.

In most real-world projects, the value of CEE is priced into the transaction upstream. Energy obligation holders or their authorized partners transfer the expected CEE value to dealers or leasing companies, which then integrate it directly into vehicle sales prices or long-term lease offers.

For companies, CEE rarely appears as a cash inflow. Instead, it is already embedded in the contract price.
Its impact is not a future reimbursement at an uncertain point in time, but a visible cost structure at the moment the decision is made.

This is precisely why CEE is particularly relevant for corporate fleets: it directly affects upfront investment, leasing terms, and total cost of ownership (TCO) calculations — the very variables that drive fleet decisions.

(Image Source: GEOTAB)

Why is the impact of CEE amplified at fleet scale?

At the individual vehicle level, CEE amounts may appear modest.
But CEE was never designed to influence individual behavior; its purpose is to amplify the economic effect of large-scale energy savings.

In fleet projects, three factors combine:

First, the volume effect: CEE is calculated per vehicle, so larger fleets generate significantly higher total volumes.
Second, vehicle type differentiation: due to higher usage intensity, light commercial vehicles carry substantially greater weight in energy-saving models than passenger cars.
Third, decision timing: once CEE is integrated into pricing, it ceases to be a post-project benefit and becomes a determining factor in whether a project proceeds at all.

This is why, in practice, CEE often has a much greater financial impact on light commercial vehicle fleets than on passenger car fleets. This is not the result of policy preference, but of usage patterns and the underlying energy-saving models themselves.

Why does process sequencing determine whether CEE applies at all?

In practice, the most common reason for CEE project failure is not vehicle ineligibility, but incorrect process sequencing.

From an institutional standpoint, the core principle of CEE is “incentive.” Energy-saving actions must take place under an existing incentive commitment to be eligible. This leads to a strict — and frequently overlooked — rule:
Any CEE-related commitment must be established before the vehicle purchase or lease contract is signed.

Once a contract is finalized, the energy-saving action is considered a fait accompli and no longer qualifies as incentivized behavior. This is the fundamental reason why many technically compliant projects ultimately receive no CEE at all.

In mature corporate fleet projects, CEE must therefore be addressed upstream, at the level of procurement design, tenders, or framework agreements, and explicitly reflected in pricing and contractual structures. This is not an administrative detail, but a methodological requirement.

Why has compliance become more critical in the current environment?

As CEE volumes and amounts increase in the transport sector, so does the associated risk profile. Under a tightening regulatory framework, CEE operations are now subject to document reviews and, in some cases, on-site inspections.

This means that CEE no longer allows for vague practices or reliance on chance. Consistency between vehicle usage, contractual documentation, and declared information has become a central risk-control factor.

At the same time, this evolution has a positive implication: when projects are genuine, logically sound, and properly documented, the predictability of CEE outcomes actually improves.

Reintegrating CEE into the overall logic of corporate fleet electrification

For companies, electrification has never been driven by a single policy instrument.

CEE affects procurement or leasing cost structures at the outset;
Taxation and depreciation rules shape annual financial performance;
Charging infrastructure and energy costs determine long-term operational efficiency.

Only when these elements are considered together can corporate fleet electrification evolve from a one-off project into a replicable and sustainable operational choice.

(Image Source: AssetWorks)

Conclusion

Looking ahead from 2026, the electrification of French corporate fleets has not entered a “post-subsidy era,” but rather a phase that demands deeper understanding of mechanisms and stronger project execution capabilities.

CEE does not guarantee project success on its own.
But ignoring CEE almost certainly leads to higher costs, slower execution, or compliance risks.

The real dividing line is no longer whether companies support electrification,
but whether they have the capability, from the very beginning of a project, to integrate CEE into vehicle selection, procurement structures, and process design. This is becoming the new baseline competence for corporate fleet electrification.

• Previous:
• Next: France’s Electric Mobility Outlook: Key Policy Updates for 2026